翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ National Firearms Act
・ National Firearms Association
・ National Firearms Museum
・ National Firefighter Selection Inventory
・ National Firefighters Memorial
・ National First Aid Society
・ National First Division
・ National First Responders Organization
・ National First XV Championship (New Zealand)
・ National fiscal policy response to the Great Recession
・ National Fish and Wildlife Foundation
・ National Fish Habitat Partnership
・ National Federation of Federal Employees
・ National Federation of Fish Friers
・ National Federation of Independent Business
National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius
・ National Federation of Independent Unions
・ National Federation of Indian Women
・ National Federation of Music Clubs
・ National Federation of Press Women
・ National Federation of Priests' Councils
・ National Federation of Republican Assemblies
・ National Federation of Republican Women
・ National Federation of State High School Associations
・ National Federation of SubPostmasters
・ National Federation of the Blind
・ National Federation of the Blind v. Target Corp.
・ National Federation of Workers' Councils
・ National Federation of Young Farmers' Clubs
・ National Federation Party


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius : ウィキペディア英語版
National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius

''National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius'', , 132 S.Ct 2566, was a landmark United States Supreme Court decision in which the Court upheld Congress's power to enact most provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), commonly called Obamacare, and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act (HCERA), including a requirement for most Americans to have health insurance by 2014. The Acts represented a major set of changes to the American health care system that had been the subject of highly contentious debate, largely divided on political party lines.
The Supreme Court, in an opinion written by Chief Justice Roberts, upheld by a vote of 5 to 4 the individual mandate to buy health insurance as a constitutional exercise of Congress's taxing power. A majority of the justices, including Chief Justice Roberts, agreed that the individual mandate was not a proper use of Congress's Commerce Clause or Necessary and Proper Clause powers, though they did not join in a single opinion. A majority of the justices also agreed that another challenged provision of the Act, a significant expansion of Medicaid, was not a valid exercise of Congress's spending power as it would coerce states to either accept the expansion or risk losing existing Medicaid funding.
== Background ==
(詳細はPresident Barack Obama signed the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act into law. A number of parties sued, claiming that the sweeping reform law was unconstitutional for various reasons. The Supreme Court granted certiorari to three cases, totaling 5 1/2 hours of oral arguments: ''National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius'' (which consolidated a part of ''Florida v. Dept. of Health and Human Services'') on the issues of the constitutionality of the individual mandate and the severability of any unconstitutional provisions, ''Dept. of Health and Human Services v. Florida'' on the issue of whether review was barred by the Anti-Injunction Act, and ''Florida v. Dept. of Health and Human Services'' on the matter of the constitutionality of the Medicaid expansion.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.